GPersonem@il

Unemployed Homeless Guy has work. For You

30/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

Just reminded of how little Canada’s human rights activist’s, court’s or the national and local media do concern themselves with the public tax payer funding of private Catholic (a tax exempt charity by the way) religious schools to the exclusion of all other private schools as they do with Canada’s natives, illegal immigrants, anti-semitism, homophobia, equal rights and racism .

The discriminate public funding of the Catholic religion in this country to the exclusion of all other religion’s is not an “issue” with Canada’s human rights activists, courts or the media for some reason ?

I would like to remind our elected members that they are responsible for this hate crime in progress and that Canada’s courts have not been reasonable or equitable in their interpretation of the law re: hetero-sexual marriage being found discriminatory and unconstitutional while the public funding of private Catholic religious schools to the exclusion of all other private schools constitutional hence not discriminating.

It is really your job and not that of the court’s to fix this racist, discriminate, unequal, funding by our government(s) of this one religion to the exclusion of all the others.

I would suggest that rather than the public paying for the funding of private religious schools in this country that they should fund themselves’ as all the rest of Canada’s private elementary schools should and do.

Sincerely Yours,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

P.S.Calling a private school a college or collegiate should not allow the Catholic Church or any church to get around basic requirements of a new law that you would write that would save Canadian taxpayers billions of dollars a year and would end this provincial racist, discriminating, criminal, abuse of public tax dollars.

Advertisements

June 30, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

"Tax Relief" and Spend Policies.

30/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

Twenty nine separate tax cuts for who ?

Tax relief for who ?

You did raise the lowest income tax rate by fifty per cent for next year over the promised limp Liberal one percent tax reduction.

So who is getting all these 29 tax cuts ?

Canada’s workers are reportedly paying twice as much federal income tax as Canada’s businesses and recieving less than half as much in federal welfare subsidies.

Ontario has been run into the mud by inept politics with little hope of ever recovering from a one hundred billion dollar debt, a five billion dollar deficit and forty billion dollar hydro debt.

Interest rates are slowly rising costing billions more for our governments to finance their irresponsible spending promises and incompitant waste and spend pandering promises, at the same time they give themselves secret twenty thousand dollar a year pay increases and four thousand dollar a year cost of living allowance increases.

Would you like to debate the above facts with a homeless, unemployed, worker who collects five hundred and thirty six dollars per month total cost of living for food, shelter and all basic needs per month.

I’ll guess no.

I eat courtesy of the Salvation Army and contrary to some big talkers have yet to see or even hear of any Catholic charity that does anything for anyone (except themselves) out here on the streets.

You wanna complain, come live with me for a week, I will guarentee you won’t be complaining about the tempurature of your wine or clam chowder for at least the rest this year.

Poor thing, stays at the Ottawa Raddisson for only two thousand four hundred dollars a month, such frugalality of our elected members.

Of course you work for your money as is evidenced by the great government accomplishments of the past decade.

Sincerely Yours,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

June 30, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Third World Politics

28/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

I know that you are very busy determining the direction of Canada’s workers and Canada’s economy unfortunatly you have overlooked one little thing, reality.

That’s what is real and not fabricated for effect.

Something I am very sure most politicians do find difficult to grasp or comprehend.

In your bull head rush to secure Canada’s economic future are you being led by a nose ring to fund post secondary education while ignoring the Canada Labour Code and Canada Revenue law ?

Are you sure that the global warming scare hasn’t gone to your head and left you confused because the Liberals and NDP do pander so heavily for political purposes as opposed to practical or beneficial reasons ?

The future can not be supported by professional’s CAN NOT and anyone who says otherwise has found a political pander-mint.

A gold mint for post secondary education and the inteligencia burgoise.

You people need a salary decrease to clear your minds of toptwopercentitis, an awful disease that was resently discovered by doctor Shortofbrains PHD. LCBO.

I would like to suggest that the issue (MP salary decrease) be introduced by the government and put to a vote of confidence in the house of commons as soon as possible.

Have a nice day (and summer work-athon), you really should not wait for April Fool’s Day to have the above mentioned confidence vote in the house of commons.

Sincerely Yours,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

June 29, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Accountability

29/06/2006, – click title for link

Dear member of parliament,

Just reading some “bloggs” from the internet and found this interesting news article about Government accountability, which I would consider a nail in the coffin of any who might say that MP base salaries should not be immediatly reduced by fifty per cent and all their perks, c.o.l.a. and pension’s cancelled completely.

Accountability ?

*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

P.S. If this is the result of secret meetings among yourselves one might wonder the results of secret meetings you might have with foreigners.

For shame it took the Toronto Star to point this out to the public.

Quiet gift for MPsJun. 28, 2006. 01:00 AM

On Saturday, Canada Day, the rate on the Goods and Services Tax will fall from 7 per cent to 6 per cent.But you already knew that.The Conservative government has used every opportunity to tell you that if your family is typical, the GST cut will save you about $300 a year.But what you probably don’t know is that Members of Parliament have also given themselves something.

At a secret meeting May 1, Speaker Peter Milliken and the House leaders of the four parties decided to boost the MPs’ expense allowance for living in Ottawa by 20 per cent, from $20,000 to $24,000.Although the base salary for MPs now stands at $147,700,( increasing to over 167,000 in 2007) the attendees at the closed-door meeting concluded that to house themselves in Ottawa, the people’s representatives needed $2,000 (aprox. double the average cost to rent a luxury two bedroom condo) a month.

**As far-fetched as it sounds, what they did was comparable to a union writing and ratifying a new contract without even letting the negotiators for the employer into the room.**

#They didn’t issue a press release advising taxpayers. They didn’t call a press conference so the media could spread the good news.#

What they did was to wait more than a month, and release the minutes of their meeting last Friday, the day the House adjourned for the summer recess. (I thought Jean Chretien was retired)
What happened to the “new way of doing business” in Ottawa, to the promise of transparency to enable taxpayers to know how their money is being spent?

If MPs really did need another $4,000 to get by on : ( , they should have made the case to their employers — the taxpayers — and had the courage to defend that request, instead of doing a deal in secret, and keeping it under wraps until they could run away and hide for the summer.

Shame on the Conservatives. Shame on the Liberals. Shame on the Bloc Québécois. And shame on the New Democrats.

June 29, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Equalization and Government Welfare

29/06/2006

Dear minister of finance the honourable James Flaherty mp,

I did just read that the federal Conservative Party did promise to keep oil and gas revenues exempt from federal transfer taxes, a promise is a promise.

Not that I agree with this special treatment for oil and gas producing provinces because it is just more of the cheep pandering that we have seen all to much of from previous governments.

I was wondering if you remember the election promise by Stephen Harper mp to “end corporate welfare”.

I would like to offer that on top of cancelling corporate welfare completely, corporate tax rates do need to be doubled at the same time as reducing payroll taxes by an equal amount.

Also mp salaries should be reduced by fifty per cent immediately and pensions made unavailable to those with less than twenty years of service, the same as for the military.

Sincerely Yours,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

June 29, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

MP Salaries, What A Sham.

27/06/2006

Dear Prime Minister of Canada mp,

Although I do appreciate the hard work and dedication of those who run our country I do wonder why they must consider themselves to be so hard done by or undervalued that they would give themselves a one hundred and forty per cent pay increase in base salary between the years 2000 (68,200.00 + 22,ooo.00) to 2007, ( I think if you check you should find that my facts are correct) I must include the twenty thousand dollar pay raise your giving yourselves next year because of the time it will take for the government to vote to lower mp salaries by fifty percent. Of course if it takes until next year you would need to make the reduction sixty percent to bring the base salaries in line.

You may give yourself a pay raise as I do believe you have to date been exceptional though your cabinet has been pathetic and should get neither a pay increase nor decrease from their overall present rate of, I think, around two hundred thousand dollars, plus , plus, plus .

To help you with the funding formula for mp salaries I might suggest that first base salaries be cut by fifty percent of today’s value, they may keep their twenty thousand dollar a year cost of living allowance as a perk for the cost of running for election. Twenty years of service before qualifing for a full pension.

Once mp salaries are slashed by fifty percent leaving cabinet ministers salaries at the present rate and giving yourself a one hundred thousand dollar a year raise so you can at least keep up with the post secondary school President’s, you could then determine by formula, using the three above mentioned salaries as base factors in determining all other salaries.

There should be no hidden perks in those values.

All “perks” for mp’s including pensions and c.o.l.a. should be kept separate from salaries.

Pay increases, decreases should be connected to the national yearly net income increase, decrease of the average Canadian tax payer.

I am not an accountant, merely a labourer who sees things his way.

The fifty percent pay cut in mp base salaries should be a must and should not wait another day.

MP’s are no better or worse than the average Canadian though they do face more out of pocket expense than the average labourer , though I would not say more than than the average business owner or entrepreneur, thus they should be allowed to keep their c.o.l.a. as a perk.

The leader of the C.A.W. Union in my opinion is a mad, millionaire, megalomaniac and does not represent the average Canadian by any means and should not in any sense or case ever be considered a legitimate source for gauging salary increase, decrease or for the cost of living, and should not in my opinion be allowed to politick while a paid union activist.

Sincerely Yours,
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

P.S. All facts and figures above should only be considered if considered at all as a ruff outline for a mp salary formula.Dear member of parliament,

MPs in top two per cent of wage earners with $147,700 salary this year .

28/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

What is this some kind of April fools joke ?

I can not wait until your fifty percent pay cut becomes law.

I’m looking forward to you voting yourselves this fifty per cent pay cut more than I do the decrease in the GST that you passed into law.

Now if we could just get you to work a little for your salary, post fifty per cent pay cut we would really be getting somewhere.

Personally I think you should all be replaced by a dictator, Buzz Hargrove is my choice who’s yours.

Yourself, or “the Queen” I’d Bet.

Sincerely Yours,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

June 28, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Employer’s that steal

28/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

London Ontario cab drivers and all of Ontario’s lease to own and owner operator truck drivers are employees who are allowed to work as contractors in this country contrary to Canada Labour Code and Revenue law.

I was just wondering if you were going to correct this criminal problem or just go on not doing your job as usual.

Just trying to avoid a class action law suit that would make your Caledonia problem look like a boy scout jamboree.

Why doesn’t anyone want to stop illegal workers and illegal employers from profiting at the expense of everyone who works legally and pay their taxes ?,

I still have not been paid for at least ten days of orientation, that is over one thousand dollars owed to me according to the federal labour code hours of work definition is 002.

This hours of work definition also stipulates that an employee shall be paid at the regular rate of pay during training, I did spend a further three days on the road and received only about twenty five percent of regular pay and have never been paid overtime after sixty hours which in long distance trucking is two and a half days.

I normally work three to fourteen days away from home at a time and never have been paid overtime except at one Cambridge company that did pay some overtime though not as much as is required by law.

When I brought this to the attention of the ministry of labour representative all they could offer me was a lame ass write to your mp if you don’t like it, contrary to the hours of definition is002.

So I have and should continue to do so until I have been paid for the above complaints which the Canada labour program employee’s have REFUSED to collect for me contrary to the Canada labour code and the hours of work definition is002.

I do realize that you want to tag and label complainers as “disgruntled” but I am only complaining because your employee’s are not doing their job, contrary to the law, and absolutely no one is doing anything about it.

I suggest you all should vote yourselves another pay increase for the super great job your doing allowing employers to rob workers and avoid paying payroll taxes, great work, fabulous, super stuff, kudos’.

You would not have a chance to do the job you are elected to do if I were your employer because at the end of this letter would be your “pink slip” and a demand for repayment of your salaries over the last twenty years.

End of story.

Sincerely Yours,

*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

P.S. Employer’s are not going to pay thier employees anything if they do not have to and you let them not pay me for over twenty years and counting.
I’m sure this is very disturbing to you especially in light of my requests for you to lower your salaries by fifty per cent.

June 28, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Separatist Quebecer’s are Anglophobic Hate Criminals.

27/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

“Quebecois”, “Franco-Canadians”, Quebecers say that they are special people who should be treated special by the rest of Canada, because they do speak french while most Canadians do not.

The NDP and separatists want Quebec to be a distinct society, “special” “outstanding” “superior” to all other provinces and territories and want the prime minister to officially recognize Quebec as a nation.

I think that the NDP and Jack Layton mp need to read the hand guide to equality and anti-racism because Quebec’s wantoness for nationhood strikes of anglophobic racism under Canada’s new hate crimes law.

The majority of Quebecers voted against separation, the rest are anglophobic, anti-Canadian, franco-separatist racists.

Quebecers and francophone’s are not mistreated by Canada in fact I would say that non french Canada has bent over backward to keep Quebec and “french-Canadians” satisfied, to no end.

Canada should stop bending over backward for Quebec separatistism and national bilingual policy should be dropped, the metric system erased from Canada and Quebecers allowed to be as french and franco in the province of Quebec as they wish to be (as is the case already) without any federal assistance or interference.

I should write more about Jack Layton mp, Gilles Duceppe mp and Pat Hoy Liberal mpp and their franco-separatist anglophobic hatred of anglo Quebecers in the future.

Sincerely Yours,
*
*
*,Ontario, Canada
*

June 27, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Is Quebec a Nation, a "nation" or a Province ?

26/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

Recognition of Quebec as a nation is being requested of the government by Jack Layton NDP mp and an Ontario Liberal mpp.

I am really not sure why Jack Layton or an Ontario Liberal mpp would find this important for their constituents unlike cutting taxes and lowering mp and mpp salaries by fifty percent.

Quebec is a province, Mr.Layton, not a nation. Quebec never should be a “Nation” again except in the context of separation. That is if Quebec separates and becomes a Nation completely apart from Canada.

Quebecers are Canadians and when Quebec becomes a nation I would expect that Quebecers would no longer be Canadians and therefore ineligible to hold office in any Canadian government seat or office including that of federal member of parliament.

In the mean time, here’s to hoping you will cancel all federal bilingual programs as soon as possible.

Don’t forget to vote to lower your salaries by fifty per cent please.

Sincerely Yours,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada,
*

June 27, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

When Hell Freezes Over

Two guys from Toronto die and wake up in hell.
The next day the devil stops in to check on them and sees them dressed in parkas, mittens and toques warming themselves around the fire. The devil asks them, “What are you doing? Isn’t it hot enough for you?” The two guys reply, “Well, you know, we are from Canada, the land of snow and ice and cold. We are just happy for a chance to warm up a little bit, eh.
“The devil decides that these two aren’t miserable enough and turns up the heat. The next morning he stops in again and there they are, still dressed in parkas, toques and mittens.
The devil asks them again, “It’s awful hot down here, can’t you guys feel it?” Again the two guys reply, “Well, like we told ya yesterday, we are from Canada, the land of snow and ice and cold. We are just happy for a chance to warm up a little bit, eh.
“This gets the devil a little steamed up and he decides to fix these two guys. He cranks the heat up as high as it will go.
The people are wailing and screaming everywhere. He stops by the room with the two guys from Canada and finds them in light jackets and bucket hats, grilling sausage and drinking beer.
The devil is astonished, “Everyone down here is in abject misery, and you two seem to be enjoying yourselves.”
The two Canadians reply, “Well, ya know,we don’t get too much warm weather up there in Toronto so we have just got to have a cook-out when the weather’s THIS nice.
“The devil is absolutely furious, he can hardly see straight. Finally he comes up with the answer. The two guys love the heat because they have been cold all their lives.
The devil decides to turn all the heat off in hell.The next morning, the temperature is below zero, icicles are hanging everywhere; people are shivering so bad that they are unable to do anything but wail, moan and gnash their teeth.
The devil smiles and heads for the room with the two Canadians. He gets there and finds them back in their parkas, toques, and mittens.NOW they are jumping up and down, cheering, yelling and screaming like mad men!!!
The devil is dumbfounded, “I don’t understand, when I turn up the heat your happy. Now it’s freezing cold and your still happy. What is wrong with you two???
“The Torontonians look at the devil in surprise, “Well, don’t you know? If Hell freezes over,
it must mean the Leafs have won the Stanley Cup.”

June 23, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | 1 Comment

Poltical Pandering.

23/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

I am still waiting for my apology and redress for over twenty years of negligence and employment discrimination by the federal ministry’s of labour and revenue.

I am not a minority pandering with the support of the NDP, C.A.W. and limp Liberals so therefore I doubt that I or any others in my position, there are thousands in this country, shall ever see a penny of what is truly owed to them.

The Chinese came here knowing that they had to pay this head tax why should there be redress for them?

This was not an act of racism because the government had to control the number of immigrants coming into this country because there weren’t enough jobs for them all, nothing racist or wrong with what the government did.

The head tax applied to Chinese not because of any racist bent but to keep out the Chinese labourers because they weren’t needed as they had been previously.

The head tax amounted to two years wages is outrages but who forced them to pay it ?

No one, they came here voluntarily knowing they would have to pay the head tax.

Politicians pandering anti- racism on behalf of greedy immigrants and useless politicians that’s all this Chinese head tax apology and redress is.

Dear member of parliament where is my apology and redress for twenty two years of criminal theft by my employer’s , because of you, amounting to over four hundred thousand dollars in my case alone.

There are many others in my position and I do not hear Jack Layton mp, Olivia Chow mp, Libby Davies mp, the nations corporate unions the NDP or Liberals doing any thing to correct this very real problem that does exist.

This is not a fantasy invented by those who faced hardship willingly sixty or a hundred years ago.

See you in court.

When I sue you for knowingly disseminating lies with the intention of defrauding the taxpayers of Canada.

Sincerely Yours,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

June 23, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Oink Oink.

22/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

You are grossly overpaid.

Why ?

Why will you be paid over one hundred sixty thousnad dollars per year in 2007 when the average Canadian earns less than forty thousand dollars per year ?

This is not reasonable or fair or equitable, I wonder why those who support fairness and equality would vote to increase their own salaries by one hundred and forty per cent over the last five years ?

I want you all fired for voting yourselves this outrages criminal pay increase.

Or you can immediatly vote yourselves a fifty percent decrease and connect any future pay increases to Canada’s national pay index, increase or decrease.

Not to the C.A.W. or to judges pay increases.

I demand that you lower your salaries by fifty percent immediatly.

Sincerely Yours,

*
*
* ,Ontario, Canada
*

June 22, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Criminal Misappropriation of Public Tax Dollars.

22/06/2006

Dear minister of finance the honourable James Flaherty m.p.,

Since the Catholic Church in the province of Ontario is partly funded by public taxes, seventy two per cent of Catholic school cost is paid by non-Catholic public taxes to the exclusion of all other private and religious schools, should the Catholic Church continue too receive charitable tax free status?

I believe it is illegal in Canada for a tax registered charity to directly profit from public tax funding ?

I do know that the provincial NDP, Liberal, “Conservative” parties and the Ontario human rights commission do support this illegal funding of the Catholic Church with public tax dollars and do wonder if your government does also support this criminal misappropriation of public tax dollars ?

Sincerely Yours,

*
*
*, Ontario, Canada,
*

June 22, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

What Are You Waiting For ?

21/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

I do realize that “putting a stop to corporate welfare” was not one of the top five priorities for this government, neither was giving special treatment to Quebec but you did that anyway.

You did write a lame budget and you had to get opposition support to get it passed and that is exactly what this government has done, just more of the same old pandering ways to get by.

Liberal, lame, limp along, pander to the separatists, pander to the Liberals, pander to the NDP.

You could have changed all that with an appropriate budget, but you didn’t .

Now that “Quebec is a Nation” I would expect that Quebecer’s would lose their Canadian citizenship immediatly and be removed from all federal offices including the military and have all of their federal funding ceased at once.

I don’t understand what is going on, what are you waiting for ?

Why should the rest of Canadians tolerate this federal government that allows Quebec to have its cake and eat ours too ?

What a bunch.

What’s the matter ?

Why are you in politics?

You have sold this country out to a foreign government, Quebec.

I would call that treason and you should be hanged.

How are you going to fix the Quebec problem, by giving them more federal power until they finally run the entire country from Quebec City ?

Get out of parliament you bunch of phony Conservatives.

Though I’m sure Brian Mulroney is well pleased with your progressiveness so far.

When are you going to end corporate welfare and lower taxes by fifty percent on all employees ?
I am also looking forward to you voting yourselves a fifty percent pay cut sooner rather than later please.

Hurry please. A.S.A.P. please.

What are you waiting for ?

Sincerely Yours,

*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

June 21, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

environmentaly friendly

20/06/2006

Canada’s federal government should adopt the same vehicle emission standards as California as part of a comprehensive plan to fight global warming, says the David Suzuki Foundation.
“With roughly identical population sizes and similar car markets, California and Canada face the same urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions,” says Pierre Sadik, senior policy advisor with the David Suzuki Foundation. “But while California appears to be well on its way to reducing vehicle emissions, Canada continues to rely on weak, voluntary guidelines.”
California’s new vehicle standards will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 23 per cent in 2012 and 30 per cent by 2016. Ottawa should introduce the standard for 2009, the same year it takes effect in California, says Mr. Sadik.
Under these regulations, Canadians would save between $3,500 and $5,000 in fuel costs over the lifetime of a vehicle – an amount that would easily offset the $400 to $1,200 that would be added to the price of a new vehicle. As well, Canadian auto parts manufacturers stand to benefit from the production of new and unique parts for this generation of cars built to the California standard.
Tougher regulations on automobile emissions can also reduce air pollution and improve overall public health. Estimates of the number of preventable premature deaths, mainly among senior citizens, caused annually by air pollution in Canada range from 5,900 to 16,000. The most recent study by the federal government estimated 5,900 premature deaths annually in eight major cities.
“Vehicle emission regulations bring sanity to a sector where manufacturers have allowed smog and climate change emissions to spiral out-of-control,” says Mr. Sadik. “The California emission standard will save drivers money, help reduce smog in Canadian cities, and will get us on the road to meeting our Kyoto commitment.”
– 30 –
For more information contact: Pierre Sadik Senior Policy AdvisorDavid Suzuki FoundationOffice: (613) 594-5845 Cell: (613) 799-8626
Yours Truly,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

Mr. ***** ******
********7@yahoo.ca

Dear Mr. ******:

Thank you for your e-mail of June 20, concerning Canada ’s approach to the issue of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

I assure you that the Government is committed to addressing this important environmental issue. To do that, we need a new approach to reducing pollution and GHG emissions that is effective and realistic for Canada. We will develop solutions that involve all Canadians—the provinces and territories, stakeholders, the private sector and individuals.

In Budget 2006, the Government announced the first steps for a Made‑in‑Canada approach. A 15.5‑percent tax credit for the purchase of monthly transit passes took effect on July 1. Up to $1.3 billion will be provided to support public transit capital investments. I am also leading the development of options for implementing a 5‑percent average renewable content in Canadian motor fuels. Our government is consulting with the provinces and territories on how to move forward with this commitment.

To build on these initiatives, I will be working with my Cabinet colleagues to develop a plan that will have many benefits for Canadians, including: cleaner air and water to protect the health of families and their communities; opportunities to build a competitive and sustainable Canadian economy; energy security; development and use of new technologies; actions at the local level; and greater accountability to Canadians. Budget 2006 allocates $2 billion over the next five years to the Made-in-Canada approach to reducing pollution and GHG emissions.

I appreciate your taking the time to share your views, and trust that I can count on your support as we undertake this important work.

Yours sincerely,

Original signed by

Rona Ambrose

June 20, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Pay for your own child care, whore.

20/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

Canadians already pay on average over fifty percent of their total yearly incomes out in taxes, that leaves the average Canadian who earns forty thousand dollars a year with less than twenty thousand dollars to pay the mortgage or rent and food and insurance and gas, car payments.

That is why it takes two income earners and hence the need for out of household child care. The five billion promised by the Martin Liberals was only a small portion of the actual cost of government funded daycare and was done only as a desperate attempt by a Liberal to bribe the public for their vote.

Mr. Harper PM would be much wiser to cancel all funding for this panderers child care funding plan and lower taxes on workers by fifty percent.

Excuse me NDPand Liberal politicians, but surplus tax dollars are not for you or Stephen Harper PM, to spend on fairy tale promises. Canada has a five hundred billion dollar debt which is the only place a surplus may be spent or return it to the taxpayers who have overpaid their taxes for the year.

I am seriously considering suing the next politician I hear say that our government should spend the federal tax surplus.

How dare you overpaid thieves imagine that you can take a surplus and spend it on your vote pandering which is all the NDP and Liberal parties seem capable of.

I want your salaries reduced by at least fifty percent although I know that most of you would still be overpaid.

YOU CAN NOT FUND A NATIONAL HEALTH CARE PLAN ( Jack Layton,
Libby Davies, Paul Martin ).

HOW COULD YOU EVEN IMAGINE THAT YOU COULD FUND A
NATIONAL CHILD DAY CARE PLAN ON TOP OF THE HEALTH CARE
PLAN.

I know your pay cheque falls out of the sky unlike the rest of us who work for a living. That is something I am very interested in seeing you fix by voting to lower your salaries by at least fifty percent.

I WANT YOU PEOPLE TO LOWER YOUR SALARIES BY AT LEAST FIFTY PERCENT BEFORE YOU EVEN IMAGINE SPENDING ANOTHER PUBLIC TAX DOLLAR ON CHILD DAY CARE VOTE PANDERING !!

I look forward to this almost as much as the decrease in the GST.

Sincerely yours,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

P.S. Don’t forget to “stop corporate welfare”.

June 20, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

What’s three billion dollars ?

19/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

Purchasing four new c-17 transport aircraft at a cost of 3 billion dollars is silly.

I “googled” for the price of these planes and they sell from 180 million to 220 million a piece, that means four would cost at the very most 880 million dollars U.S. not 3 billion dollars Canadian.

General Hillier says that the money would be better spent on smaller transport aircraft and other equipment more needed, he is the head of Canadian Armed Forces, he should know what’s needed.

I support puchasing these planes if they are needed at a fair price but how does it cost 3 billion dollars for one billion dollars worth of airplanes ?

The Russian Antonoves Transport can be purchased new for fifteen percent of the cost of a c-17. I do not know about the parts and maintanance though.

For another two billion dollars you could purchase a brand new Nimitz class nuclear powered U.S. aircraft carrier fully stocked with brand new F-18’s. (Which would be a much wiser and more needed purchase in my opinion).

Are you sure your being transparent and accountable ?

Yours Truly,

*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

June 19, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | 2 Comments

Lowering MP Salaries.

18/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

I would like you to vote yourselves a fifty percent pay cut and require twenty years of elected service to collect a pension that does not begin to pay until age sixty five.

Though there are some good mp’s I have noticed that most of you are there to pander to voters with their own overtaxed wallets.

This is irresponsible behaviour and should not be rewarded.

A very big deal has been made out of a few million dollars (“adscam”) that has been misused yet the Liberal government did spend or have promised to spend about fourteen billion dollars in the last five years on utterly useless projects for purely vote pandering purposes. No one seems to care about the fourteen billion but misplace one and half million in advertising and the world comes to an end.

I know what you do to pander for votes, the NDP and Liberals spend their days dreaming up ways to spend taxpayer dollars to garner votes for themselves, I suppose that is politics but to pay you each a hundred and forty thousand dollars base salary to do so is reprehensible.

Yours Truly,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

P.S. The recent Conservative federal budget was pathetic except for lowering the g.s.t. which some *&*&a*@ in government tried to spin into a tax reduction for the poor in order to avoid lowering payroll taxes.
Save the tax and spend stuff please for the vote panderers and lower working taxes by raising the minimum amount on the tax form to twenty five thousand dollars or go join with the Liberals who would rather send out paychecks and invent spending programs for dead beat mothers and give tax credits.

June 19, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Donations.

How can I donate to help keep Canadian Blog Exchange going?
I recently recieved an email from Blog Exchange.us stating that they didn’t have the time and resources needed and were closing.
I thought it was the Canadian Blog Exchange.
I feel a need to donate now.
Is there a way for us to donate to CBE without a credit card ?
Everyone send in a few bucks .

Hi blanks,I want to let all members know that BlogXchange will be closing on Saturday, 6/24/06. I am unable to devote the necessary time and effort required to continue managing the site, due to other time committments. For those of you who have paid memberships, please sign into Paypal and cancel your subscription. I will refund your most recent month’s upgrade fee. Anyone who has purchased credits since 6/10 (14 days prior to the closing date) will receive a refund of the amount paid.Thanks for having been a member, and for supporting the site.Regards,Jim QuinnBlogXchange.us

June 16, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | 5 Comments

Quebecer’s are terrorists too.

16/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

Quebec is getting to much favour from Canada’s government because Stephen Harper is a coward in my opinion.

At least Trudeau, Chretien, Martin and Mulroney were Quebecers and could be excused for their inept incompetent dealings with the separatist racist french only wing of Quebecers.
There is no excuse or reason for this government to give anything to Quebec that they won’t give to any other province, in fact all other provinces should now have the same rights as Quebec regarding UNESCO.

I have learnt that Quebec is not even officially bilingual, yet the rest of the country is expected to cater to the french, that is not federal bilingualism that is Quebec getting things their way.

All federal funding for bilingualism in this country should be halted and Quebecers should be removed from Canadian federal offices and from parliament immediately. I would like to suggest beginning with Canada’s Armed Forces.

Please, this pandering to Quebec has gone on for too long and now has gone to far.

You would not need the Bloc Quebecois to prop you up if you were competent.

Quebec needs to be put in its place by removing their citizens from Canadian government offices and military, then Quebecers can run their own “Nation” apart from Canadian federal funds and official bilingualism.

A.S.A.P.

Sincerely Yours,
*
*, Ontario, Canada

June 16, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Nuclear power is not environmently friendly.

14/06/2006

Dear the honourable minister of the environment Laurel C. Broten mpp,

I do not believe that nuclear energy is an environmentally friendly or cost effective way for Ontario to meet its need for electrical power now or in the future.

Nuclear power has in the past been expensive hence Ontario’s fifty billion dollar subsidy debt and the used nuclear fuel as well as the active power plant itself is an environmental disaster waiting to happen.

I did read in a newspaper headline, though not the story, that it was going to cost Ontario one hundred and forty billion dollars to “safely” dispose of its used nuclear fuel. This does not sound very cost efficient.

Canada’s largest natural resource is coal with a 1,400 year supply.

Alberta has a coal fired power plant which has emissions similar to that of natural gas and I therefore can not imagine how your government can justify spending forty six billion more dollars to build more nuclear reactors in this province.

You should know as well as I do that Ontario’s previous record for nuclear spending starts with a figure such as your estimated forty six billion dollars then over time balloons to two, three, four, or five times the original cost estimate.

There are cleaner burning coal power plants that could be under construction right now in this province, we do not need more expensive unclean nuclear power and the present nuclear reactors should be shut down as soon as it is possible to do so.

Yours Truly,

*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

June 14, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Chinese head pandering.

14/06/2006

Dear members of parliament,

I just read that the prime minister of Canada is going to apologize on June 23rd for a perfectly legitimate attempt by the Canadian government to stem the tide of Chinese immigrants to Canada. Later the government banned outright Chinese immigration to this country.

This was not racist behaviour but a legitimate act to slow the numbers of immigrants from one particular country who kept coming after the need had been met and they did come hear knowing they would have to pay the head tax and knowing this would cause them hardship.

Theancestors of these immigrants from china are pandering from our federal government and should be stripped of their citizenship here and sent back to China, how long before some other group finds a cheap way to accuse the government of racism and wants money for their hardship.

No one is apologizing to the Irish who were denied housing in the 1800’s because they were considered dirty monkeys.

Don’t forget to apologize to the natives for that french explorer working for England, John Cabot, how dare that racist bast** discover North America.

Get out the federal wallet because the natives are going to be needing some hefty payola for being pushed off eighty thousand million hectares of prime real estate.

Sharpen your apology pen and maybe you should apologize to homosexuals for the years of horrible abuse they have suffered as a result of the Canadian government’s previous criminalizing of sodomy.

Then you should apologize to the polar bears and Eskimo’s for global warming, I see big bucks associated with this apology.

Olivia Chow mp and the NDP could then offer a legitimate apology to Canadian citizens and tax payers for pursuing this kind of cheap political pandering that is going to cost billions of tax dollars for no legitimate reason whatsoever.

Sincerely Yours,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

P.S. I do not hear from any federal NDP members of parliament raising the unfair tax burden that workers in this country are labouring under, paying double the amount of federal income tax of companies and receiving less in federal welfare.
NDP the silence is deafening.

A quick reply from Libby Davies mp was recieved before my send button had cooled.

NDP CALLS ON GOVERNMENT TO PROVIDE FAIR DEAL FOR CHINESE HEAD TAX PAYERS
Date:
Wed, 14 Jun 2006 13:35:42 -0400
From:
“Davies, Libby – M.P.”
To:
*7@yahoo.ca

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NOVEMBER 22, 2005
NDP CALLS ON GOVERNMENT TO PROVIDE FAIR DEAL FOR CHINESE HEAD TAX PAYERS
OTTAWA – NDP Leader Jack Layton along with his caucus colleagues, House Leader Libby Davies (Vancouver East), Immigration Critic Bill Siksay (Burnaby-Douglas) and MP Peter Julian (Burnaby-New-Westminster), urged the Prime Minister to find a compromise and fair deal for all Chinese Canadian head tax payers and their families, today.
“These families deserve an apology and real respect from this government,” said Layton. In a letter to the Prime Minister, the Federal NDP questioned the government’s reasoning in allocating $12.5 million for a redress project to a single organization without including thousands of head tax payers, their families and their representatives.
“It is completely inadequate for this government to exclude at least 4000 head tax payers, their families and descendants through a lump sum agreement with only one organization,“ said Davies.
$12.5 million has been allocated to Chinese Canadians through the Acknowledgement, Commemoration and Education (ACE) Fund, established for communities affected by wartime and similar past measures. The government is expected to announce Wednesday that it will sign over the entire allocation to the National Congress of Chinese Canadians, despite calls from several other organizations, such as the Chinese Canadian National Council, to be involved in any commemorative, educational or other key measures that may arise from the fund.
“At the forefront of the redress movement is the Chinese Canadian National Council, which represents thousands of head tax payers and their families,” said Layton, “but if this deal goes forward in its current form, CCNC will have no say in how the funds will be spent.”
“The Prime Minister should remember his responsibility to find a course of compromise that will address the needs of the diverse community of Chinese Canadians that deserve to be acknowledged here,” said Julian.
“Finding a compromise to address the injustices committed against Chinese immigrants to Canada over a period of decades should be this government’s first priority,” added Siksay.
The Canadian government collected $23 million from Chinese Immigrants to Canada between 1885 and 1923.
-30-
For more information, please contact: Jack Layton – Karl Belanger: (613) 995-**** Libby Davies – Leanne Holt: (613) 992-**** Bill Siksay – Sonja vanDieen: (613) 996-****Peter Julian – Henri Sader: (613) 992-****

June 14, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Aboriginal whiners

13/06/2006

Dear Minister of Indian Affairs the Honourable Jim Prentice M.P.,

” Aboriginal peoples”, “Canada’s Native peoples”, “Indian’s” because Columbus thought that the America’s was India, will never stop whining about their poverty and hardship as long as they continue to isolate themselves or be isolated.Reserves are an old hold over from the 1700’s and 1800’s and should be abolished.

That will cost the Natives all of their political whining and billions in federal welfare and so is unlikely to be popular with the “Indians” who would rather go on with their incessant “Aboriginal” whining.

I for one am sick of hearing of the hardships of the Natives and not unlike that of Quebeker’s who’s state is used by political pandering and the Natives themselves to get attention and federal welfare.

I would like to ask the Minister to consider closing Canada’s Native Reserves for the well being of those who are “isolated”, “underemployed” and lacking the necessary resources to support themselves.

Sincerely Yours,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

June 13, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Are you intolerant ?

12/06/2006

Dear minister of justice and the attorney general of Canada the honourable Vic Toews mp.,

Those in Calgary who are still not tolerant.”

This is a quote from a City TV news article in which the news reporter is referring to an incident at the Calgary gay pride parade. A man there who was holding a sign which contradicted the views of a minority of Canadians who support legalized sodomy and the perverted behaviour and lifestyles of homosexuals and who was beaten and spit upon by gay pride supporters.

This is intolerant, irresponsible and phobic news reporting and is detrimental in a society who’s majority of citizens do not support homosexual, “same – sex” behaviour and consider homosexuals to be perverts and hate criminals and not a discriminated minority, as they do pretend and pro-port themselves, along with some few deluded members of our own parliament(s) and some corrupted medical “professionals”.

Gay pride parade’s are intolerant and hateful of the views and opinions of the majority of Canadians and Calgary City TV is guilty of intolerant and racist news reporting for reporting that those who hold other views as being “intolerant” and racist.

I believe it is this minister of justice responsibility to act to enforce the constitutional rights and freedoms of those who are protected by Canada’s charter and constitution from this continual assault by those such as the above quoted City TV news reporter.

I would also wish to ask that the minister consider re-criminalizing sodomy and to re- criminalize homosexual behaviour, as a legitimate means to diminish this immoral lifestyle and to stop the lies that homosexuals and their depraved friends, the Canadian human rights commission’s and some Canadian court judges, do unconstitutionaly continually promote in this society.

Yours Truly,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

June 12, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Left-wing whacko Radio.

10/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

Why should Canadian tax payers have to foot the bill for left wing propaganda radio, if you don’t believe me listen to CBC overnight, it is entirely left wing mostly foreign political broadcasts, that is brainwashing citizens of this country.

This is not what Canadian tax dollars should be spent on unless you are going to give equal time to purely right wing political foreign broadcasts. This isn’t Great Britain or the Netherlands. This is Canada, the CBC is paid for with Canadian tax dollars not foreign taxes.

I want the entire CBC “Overnight’ broadcast schedule replaced by Rush Limbaugh and NRA radio two wonderful foreign right-wing broadcasts.

Come on let’s get this left wing garbage off our public airways.

Yours Truly,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

June 10, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Too reform or not too reform is that the question ?

10/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

This email are two comments I received by a very informed person who claims to be a twenty year old student in Ottawa, personally I think he might be a twenty year veteran of political experience and has upon further reconsideration changed my opinion regarding the “reform” of Canada’s Senate.

I think if you read these comments which were posted to my blog, you might find as have I that Senate “reform” may actually cause more harm than good.

Something I considered worthy of passing along.

* said …

“If you’re worried about Americanizing Parliament the place to look is not to the set election dates but to Senate reform.
By slowly implementing an elected Senate its members gain more legitimacy and thus power through the votes that sent them to office.
IMO the biggest problem in the States is the Bicarmal structure of their Congress–it leads to antidemocratic anomalies like an unelected Cabinet (but that is more likely the case because of their directly elected executive).
There is also the problem of confidence votes.
If both houses are elected what happens when Parliament (one house or another) votes that it doesn’t have confidence in the government?
There should only be one body that can propose legislation, non-confidence motions, and, in effect, govern.
I think that should be the House of Commons.
While there are a number of possible ways to reform the Senate, I don’t think making it elected (or term limits) would make Parliament more effective.
I highly expect the opposite is the case. “

“The Senate, II RC, is the remnants of the former ruling bodies of the Canada’s prior to Responsible Government. It is as much a part of our tradition as the G-G is.
Mostly these days the Senate does Committee work and gives old partisan hacks a place to go pasture. The committee work is important, it has the potential to uncover a lot of useful information.
By politicizing the Senate in the way the having it elected would this more or less sterile (while partisan) examination of bills, ect. would be lost in favour of a messier system.
I personally support the abolition of this body, but recognize its symbolic importance. Similarly while I think the idea that Canada has a monarch is Silly I think the idea of an elected Executive is worse: when such institutions are elected they gain a legitimacy and power that ruins their symbolic effectiveness.
Call it a pragmatic form of postmodernism/post-colonialism if you will. “

*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

June 10, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

"No news is good news."

09/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

I have not heard a single word from any Canadian media regarding the purported secret Bilderberger meetings this week near Ottawa, ON or of any reporting of who might be in attendance ?

I would like to ask my mp and mpp to find out or turn in your mp and mpp badge’s, and salary.

It is not just the media’s responsibility to look for possible criminal behaviour in government.

“The secretive group known as Bilderberg will hold its annual secret meeting at the posh Brook Street Resort a few miles from Ottawa, Canada, June 8-11.”

I did not find the above article reported in the Toronto Sun or the Toronto Star or the CBC or CTV.

I would like to suggest that any member of Canadian parliament found to be in attendance at these purpoted meetings with foreigners, that the media can not attend, be tried for criminal contempt.

I believe the law exists.

Possibly Belinda Stronach mp could give the media a heads up, not that they would report any thing because they could face losing more than their job if the Bilderberger’s behave like the society of secret Masonic Lodges.

Sincerely Yours,

*
*
* ,Ontario, Canada
*

June 9, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | 2 Comments

Liberal vote pandering.

09/06/2006

Dear members of parliament,

In the last two previous federal elections the Liberal’s through purely political vote pandering passed a hate crimes law, made same sex marriage legal, propped up a useless Kyoto treaty and spent five billion dollars on an undo-able national child care plan.

The cost to the citizens of this country for this political vote pandering is immeasurable and utterly destructive to a civilized society. Along with political correctness and anti -“racism” this country’s future could be doomed.

Our present government has in my opinion followed the careless and reckless example set by the previous Liberals in selling out Quebec and failing to lower taxes on workers in their budget.

In short, Canada is becoming a useless cesspool for delinquents and perverts, thanks to Liberals and I consider Brian Mulroney PM to have been a Liberal.

Canada’s new hate crimes law makes every citizen of this country a criminal, no exception which is great if your a “barrel sucking” police person.

Feminist’s and homosexuals beware, they may come after me first but you are the real haters. Feminists hate “inequality “, homosexuals hate “Christians” .

Pandering politicians cost us more than just billions of dollars.

I have heard that a Reverend was charged with a hate crime for teaching from the Bible that homosexuality is a sin.

I guess police and the human rights experts forgot about the constitutional right to freedom of religion, the Bible is a religious book, and anyone can tell you that homosexuality like adultery and murder even more so than vote pandering is sin according to the Holy Bible.

I would suggest the police get busy and start enforcing this pathetic law passed into law by a pathetic panderer who should in my opinion be the first one to be charged, for hating to pay his taxes while owner of CP ships. Something tells me that like Svend Robinson mp, he might also hate children in-utereu, because he supports abortion which is government sponsored genocide. Or how about the GST does he hate the GST, because scrapping the GST could cause harm to the revenue of Canada and hence to national child care and hence you could be a hate criminal if you hate the GST.

Sincerely Yours,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*
P.S. No hating allowed Mr. Paul Martin mp, I’ll be keeping a watch on you for any signs of hate, such as hating Americans, which could be detrimental to all Canadians and hence a hate crime under Canadian law.

June 9, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

CBC Radio is Communist.

08/06/2006

Dear minister of Canadian heritage and women, the honourable Bev Oda mp.,

I used to listen to the CBC allot, mostly CBC Radio and find it very biased toward the political left especially CBC “Overnight” which I haven’t listened to now for quite a while , over a year.

CBC Overnight was a platform for purely left wing, ie. Liberal, NDP socialist talk and socialist foreign correspondence and if it still is should have it’s entire broadcast after midnight suspended until it can be replaced with purely evangelical right wing content for at least the next thirteen years, no other opinion or content or religious views should be allowed or expressed except in the negative.

I like the CBC but it so biased,, and between Saskatoon SK and Edmonton AB I could only receive the french broadcasts of the CBC on my truck radio, I thought that was very odd.

At least in Ontario we can get the french and english.

Yours Truly,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*

June 8, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Canada’s fair and balanced broadcaster.

07/06/2006

Dear member of parliament,

Canada’s national broadcaster is a fester of leftist will and should be destroyed before some”‘non – racist” jew gets control over it .

Hitler was a left wing ,racist ,socialist, Catholic-Jew, not a right wing bible thumper, silly CBC programmers and broadcasters.

How long will this left wing festering wart and national broadcaster go on in its hateful, racist, socially destructive programing and broadcasting ?

Yours Truly,
*
*
*, Ontario, Canada
*
P.S. I’m refering here mostly to CBC Radio which is patheticaly biased to the left, much more so than CBC TV which is only biased to the left.

June 7, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

The Jean-Paul-Svend Hate crimes law, and you.

06/06/2006

Dear member of parliament, honourable minister,

I sit in contempt, contempt of a Canadian law that does make me a criminal merely for thinking homosexuality is a criminal deviant perverted behaviour.

Canada’s hate crimes law also makes criminals out of many who may think they are protected by this law.

Kieth Norton president of the Ontario human commission and the Premier of Ontario come to mind for reasons I have already pointed out to you by email and do not wish to go into further without legal council.

This law is a disgrace forced upon a democratic society by hateful persons, and left wing pinko Nazi racist left wing pinko racist Nazi racist pinko racist feminist racist left wing wacko Nazi racists who are phobic racist Nazi left wing racist Nazi racist Nazi’s.

Guilty

Sincerely yours,
*
*, Ontario, Canada

June 6, 2006 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment