God save the Queen ( part I of III )

Conservative Party linked to pro-U.S. annexation cabal

‘In the last 2006 Federal Election, the Conservative Party kept trumpeting its slogan that it would “Stand up for Canada”. Then, Opposition Leader Stephen Harper during that elected indicated that he would similarly “Stand Up” for Canadian sovereignty in the Arctic. Mr. Harper portrayed his party, as a party which would govern Canada with integrity and openness in a spirit of renewed democracy, in contrast with the ‘corruption’ of the Martin Liberals. As it turns out, these assertions by Mr. Harper could not be further from the truth.
Mel Hurtig, the founder of the Council of Canadians, and also a variety of other reliable sources including veteran CNN anchor Lou Dobbs, now reveal that senior elected representatives and advisors to the Conservative Party, are currently planning a scheme that would hand over Canada to the Bush regime by 2007. The official name for this scheme, is called “North American Union”.
Mel Hurtig, a noted Canadian author and publisher who was the elected leader of the National Party of Canada, provided researchers with the agenda and attendee list of the so-called “North American Forum” at the Fairmont Banff Springs Hotel in Banff, Alberta, Sept. 12-14, 2006.
Mr. Hurtig said the “secret meeting was designed to undermine the democratic process.” In addition, the reported Agenda undermines the Statutory position of Her Majesty the Queen of Canada, as the constitutional expression of a Canada independent from the U.S.
“What is sinister about this meeting is that it involved high level government officials and some of the top and most powerful business leaders of the three countries and the North American Forum in organizing the meeting intentionally did not inform the press in any of the three countries,” he said. “It was clear that the intention was to keep this important meeting about integrating the three countries out of the public eye,” Mr. Hurtig further indicates.
The motive for U.S. participation, according to Mr. Hurtig, was “to gain access and control Canada’s extensive natural resources, including oil and water.”
Documents obtained by researchers associated with the Council of Canadians were marked “Internal Document, Not for Public Release.” At least three current Ministers of Stephen Harper’s Conservative Party minority government are cited in the Document as “ring leaders” so-to-speak, of an unlawful and anti-constitutional effort to hand Canada to the Bush regime.
Canadian constitutional and related law is quite clear that any such effort by elected members of a government to subvert the political authority of the Government of Canada, constitutes breach of a Parliamentary Allegiance of Office, and broadly treason.
This is because the reportedly directed efforts of Ministers in the Stephen Harper government, to hand over Canada to the political authority of Mr. Bush, as the American Head of State, without the consent of the diverse Canadian public, can only be executed by the seditious overthrowing of the Crown, i.e. Canadian Head of State.
Section 128 of the Constitution Act, 1867 indicates as follows:

Every member of the Senate and the House of Commons of Canada shall before taking his Seat therein take and subscribe before the Governor General or some Person authorized by him, and every Member of a Legislative Council or Legislative Assembly of any Province shall before the Lieutenant Governor of the Province or some Person authorized by him, the Oath of Allegiance contained in the Fifth Schedule to this Act; .

The oath set out in the Fifth Schedule reads as follows:

I, A.B. do swear, That I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to Her Majesty… [Elizabeth II].

According to the Sixth Edition of Beauchesne’s Rules & Forms of the House of Commons of Canada:

Should a member violate his oath he [or she] would be amenable to the penalty of not being allowed to sit in the House of Commons. He [or she] may be suspended from taking part in the sittings while still remaining a member of Parliament, or, in a case of extreme gravity, a Bill might be passed to annul his election…
The power of dealing with treason is inherent in the Parliament of every country.

The leaked document clearly substantiates that Ministers of the Stephen Harper Government are sharing information with representatives of the U.S. military-industrial-complex, for the purposes of “surrendering” Canada to a U.S.-based “non-democratic authority”. This apparent government-sponsored effort is designed to destroy the sovereign authority of Canadians as co-owners of their society, in violation of all Canadian Constitutional Acts since 1867.
Pursuant to Section 46 (2) of the Canadian Criminal Codes “Every one commits treason in Canada, when someone (b) without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada;
Furthermore, pursuant to Section 52 of the Criminal Code of Canada, to the extent that the apparent efforts of the Stephen Harper government to surrender Canada to a non-democratic American political arrangement is seditious to “(a) the safety, security or defence of Canada,” the Stephen Harper government has executed treason. If that has indeed occurred, then the Stephen Harper government, if it has any semblance of integrity, must surrender its authority to the Governor-General acting on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen of Canada, toward new Federal Election. ‘
by Peter Mackenzie
from The Canadian blog h/t alberta spectator

January 26, 2007 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

God save the Queen ? Part II

Dear member of parliament,
I have noticed a web site which is devoted to keeping Canada out of a “North America Union”, it is called which can be found on Google.
There is another web site called ( * removed for posting to my blog) which points the finger of blame at the present Conservative government more specifically at Stephen Harper PM for being the cause of this “North American Union” which is being arranged by some big business with governement cooperation in spite of some laws which prevent members of parliament or their employee’s and Canadian citizens from participating in acts which could subvert the sovereignty of the government of Canada.Also it seems that any siting member of parliament including the prime minister swear an oath on becoming a member of parliament which would preclude any involvement in supporting any act or behaviour which could be subversive to the government of Canada.
Why Gilles Duceppe m.p., Jean Charest m.p.p., Andre Boisclair and mant others aren’t facing some sort of discipline for their frequent and even constant attempts to undermine the government of Canada without use of a referendum ?
Looks like Canada has allot more problems than worrying about “Global Warming”, the national debt, national day care, lack of military, health care, overpaid members of parliament, incompetent ministry’s etc.
Seems this alleged “North American Union” I say alleged because I must really wonder how this would be going on behind closed doors without the public even knowing.
This has not been reported in the news to my knowledge and I have never heard any member of parliament acknowledge that this work is taking place with their consent and cooperation.
Perhaps Paul Martin m.p. previous prime minister of Canada who appointed John Manley to part of the workings of this “North America Union” should or could make informed to Canadians of his extent of knowledge or of those in parliament or were in parliament and have assisted in this great accomplishment.
That the public might be informed and knowledgeable of what our elected representatives are doing while in the pay and trust of her majesties parliament.
The gallows may be to good for some in my opinion, perhaps a good old fashioned public flogging might be of a greater benefit to the general welfare or the greater public good.
Maybe the Queen knows what’s going on. Maybe not.
That doesn’t matter to me.
Sincerely yours,
* *
* * *
*, Ontario, Canada

January 26, 2007 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment

Arar gets 12.5 point – doe.

Dear member of parliament,
It seems inappropriate to me to hand over 12.5 million dollars to someone who has been suspected of ties to Al Quieda since before the “nine eleven” trade centre bombings in New York.
Since 1998 I believe, long before most of us had even heard of Al Quieda.
Without doing anything about those responsible for him being wrongly put on this list of terrorist suspects ?

‘….what Harper would not do is clean house in the RCMP and CSIS of those who are directly responsible for what happened to Arar….’

I Hope this awful situation will be corrected by “cleaning house” of those who put this innocent man on their list.


Sincerely yours,
* *
* * *
*, Ontario, Canada

January 26, 2007 Posted by | Canadian Politics | Leave a comment