Income splitting is needed

September 30, 2008

Dear member of parliament,
You might even win ‘a majority’ by sharing income splitting with the ‘stay at home’ spouse, “partner”, partner.
“The poor” need tax cuts more than they need welfare handouts, “Income-splitting” for the stay at home “partner” is likely a better vote getter and more importantly a chance to prove that the Conservatives aggressively support some tax “Equality” for the home and family.
You may remember those including myself who may find ourselves “living in poverty” in Canada and paying far too many taxes, really, and not voting for Jack Layton or Elizabeth May (born in the U.S.A.) or Gilles Duceppe (born in the “nation of the Quebecois”).
The poor do pay an exorbitant amount of their incomes in taxes of one form or another.
Imagine earning seventeen or twenty thousand dollars a year and needing a car to get to work and need to buy gasoline for that car at $1.25/l or around five dollars per gallon.
Do stop the yuppie welfare spending some of us consider that (vote pandering).
Sincerely Yours,
*, Ontario
Home to the Victory of 1812-15 and Tecumseh’s shameless loss.
Might Giovanni Caboto have a Holiday in Canada someday?

Not that he needs a rest.


September 30, 2008 - Posted by | Canadian Politics

1 Comment »

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: